Determinants of the Sustainability of Inventory Management Practices in Informal Microbusinesses: An Explanatory-Propositive Model from Process Engineering and Popular Economy

  • Giovanna Angulo Universidad de Santander - Valledupar
Keywords: informal microenterprises, popular economy, process engineering, service-learning, informal retail sector

Abstract

For a community to learn a new practice is a pedagogical achievement. For it to sustain that practice six
months later, without external support, is a social engineering achievement. This article addresses
precisely that second challenge: what factors determine whether inventory management practices adopted
by informal microenterprises — specifically neighborhood stores — are sustained over time after the
technical intervention that originated them concludes? Drawing on data generated by a service-learning
intervention conducted with 97 neighborhood stores across six municipalities in the Atlántico department
of Colombia, an explanatory-propositional model is constructed and validated with eight operationalized variables: tool complexity, post-intervention perceived usefulness, community social support, store owner
self-management capacity, accompaniment intensity, operational inventory efficiency, perceived
economic viability, and practice sustainability. The empirical analysis combines structural equation
modeling (SEM) with bootstrapping, K-means cluster analysis, and logistic regression. Results identify
perceived usefulness (beta = 0.48; p < 0.001), self-management capacity (beta = 0.39; p < 0.001), and tool
complexity as an inhibiting factor (beta = -0.38; p < 0.001) as the three highest-weight determinants of
sustainability. The model explains 67 % of the variance in the dependent variable (R² = 0.67) and correctly
classifies 81.4 % of microenterprises. Three sustainability profiles are identified, and a replicable technical
intervention design model is proposed to maximize the permanence of adopted practices in the informal
popular economy sector of Colombia. 

References

Álvarez-Morales, L., & Torres-Vargas, A. (2019). Caracterización de la gestión del inventario en
tiendas de barrio de Bogotá. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, 27(2), 101–119.
https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.3675.
• Alzate-Ortiz, F. A., Castellanos-Castillo, J. R., & Valencia-Arias, A. (2021). Gestión del conocimiento
en microempresas del sector comercio en Colombia. Información Tecnológica, 32(4), 111–120.
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 07642021000400111.
• Ballou, R. H. (2004). Logística: Administración de la cadena de suministro (5.ª ed.) Pearson
Educación.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
• Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2009). Administración de operaciones: Producción y
cadena de suministros (12.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology,
94(Suppl.), S95– S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943.
advancing
• Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009).
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework
for
implementation
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
science.
Implementation
Science,
4(1),
50.
• DANE – Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística. (2020). Encuesta de micronegocios
(EMICRON) 2020. DANE. https://www.dane.gov.co.
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of
implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of
Community Psychology, 41(3- 4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
• Fenalco – Federación Nacional de Comerciantes. (2021). Estudio del comercio minorista tradicional en
Colombia. Fenalco.
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation
research: A synthesis of the literature. University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental
Health Institute.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables
and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
• Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2016). Administración de operaciones: Procesos y cadena de suministro (11.ª
ed.). Pearson.
• Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention
innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 135–149.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.01.002.
alleviate
• Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can
help
poverty.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41166407.
California
Management
Review,
49(4),
90–111.
• Nielsen. (2022). El estado del retail en América Latina: Comercio tradicional 2022. NielsenIQ.
• OCDE. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. OECD
Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en
• Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits.
Wharton School Publishing.
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University
Press.
• Ramírez-Ospina, D. E. (2018). Decisiones de inventario en tiendas de barrio colombianas: Análisis
desde la racionalidad limitada. Pensamiento & Gestión, 44, 173–201.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
American
• Scheirer, M. A., & Dearing, J. W. (2011). An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health
programs.
Journal
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300193
of
Public
Health,
101(11),
2059–2067.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs
for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Shediac-Rizkallah, M. C., & Bone, L. R. (1998). Planning for the sustainability of community-based
health programs: Conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy.
Health Education Research, 13(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/13.1.87
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology:
Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
Published
2026-05-22
How to Cite
Angulo, G. (2026). Determinants of the Sustainability of Inventory Management Practices in Informal Microbusinesses: An Explanatory-Propositive Model from Process Engineering and Popular Economy . Sustainability, Technology and Humanism, 17(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.25213/2216-1872.148
Section
Artículos Originales

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.